
Who doesn’t love freshly baked muffins?
Just about everyone I know certainly does. And there are some people I know that just eat the muffin tops and leave the rest of the muffin.
With a Chicago metallic muffin pan you can bake 6 delicious muffins at home that look as good as shop brought muffins. And because each of the muffin pans measures 4 inches your muffins will be a nice large uniform size.
My particular favorites are chocolate chip muffins and boysenberry muffins.
With my old muffin pan it was difficult to gt them clean even in the dishwasher. Well you won’t have that problem in cleaning the Chicago Metallic Muffin Pans as they have a Silverstone coating that is easy to clean and the muffins come out of the pans with ease.
Chicago muffin pans are also available in a 12 pan size so you can make even more delicious muffins. The cup size is smaller than the 6 cup size with the pan size of 2.75 inch across x 1.25 inch deep.
This is another great pan but if you are like me you will prefer the lovely large muffins produced with the 6 pan size.
Where can I buy the wonderful Chicago Metallic Muffin Pans?
Cooking.com
Amazon.com
MOST POPULAR REVIEWS
- Stainless Steel Cookware – Cuisinart Multiclad Pro 12pc Cookware Set Review
- Pressure Canners – All American Pressure Canner Review
- Kitchenaid Artisan Stand Mixer Review – The Best Stand Mixer
- All Clad 9pc Cookware Set Review – The Best All Clad Cookware Set
- Anolon Cookware – The Best Non-Stick Cookware Set
- Rachel Ray Cookware – The Best Value for Money Non-Stick Set
Related posts:
- Chicago Metallic 12 cup Nonstick Popover Pan
- Chicago Metallic Professional Nonstick Perforated Baguette Pan
- REVIEW: Chicago Metallic Professional Nonstick Perforated Baguette Pan
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!
We found what we think is the best stainless steel cookware set on the market
This non-stick cookware set is excellent value for money and we rate it highly
There is no doubt about it, we had to rate the as our number 1 choice for Dutch Ovens.


Leave a Reply